Tarjima
When a smartphone screen cracks or the battery drains quickly, many people buy a new product instead of repairing it. That is because repairs cost little less than a new device, or it is hard even to find somewhere to take it. Some manufacturers supply parts only to official service centres and void the warranty if consumers open the device themselves. Some products are even made so that certain functions stop working when genuine parts are fitted without the manufacturer's authorisation. Electronic products discarded this way amount to tens of millions of tonnes a year worldwide, and the precious metals and hazardous substances inside are often buried without proper treatment. This is why moves to guarantee a 'right to repair' by law have emerged in Europe and elsewhere. If manufacturers are required to supply parts for a set period and publish repair manuals, consumers can ( ). We, too, must create the institutional conditions for products to be repaired before it is too late. That protects both consumers' wallets and the Earth's resources.
필자가 이 글을 쓴 목적으로 가장 알맞은 것을 고르십시오.
Izoh
Approach: a purpose question is usually answered near the end, in the sentence ending in '-아야 한다'. Here the writer says '우리도 더 늦기 전에 제품을 고쳐 쓸 수 있는 환경을 제도적으로 마련해야 한다' – urging a system that guarantees the right to repair, so option 2 is correct (key word of purpose options: '촉구하려고'). Option 1 is the trap: the text does mention why repairs are costly, but only as the lead-in to the problem, not the purpose. Option 3 is wrong because Europe is only an example of legislative moves. Option 4 is not in the text at all.
Shu savoldagi soʻzlar · soʻzlarni saqlash uchun kiring
- 닳다
- 보증
- 정품
- 인증
- 유해 물질
- 보장하다
- 제도적
( )에 들어갈 내용으로 가장 알맞은 것을 고르십시오.
Izoh
Approach: the gap sits in a '-면' conditional. Condition: manufacturers supply parts and publish manuals. The most natural result is that consumers can 'repair broken products and use them longer' – option 3, which also matches the next sentence '제품을 고쳐 쓸 수 있는 환경'. Option 1 runs against the goal of reducing e-waste. Option 2 misses the point, which is not about easier authorisation. Option 4 goes beyond the text: consumers would not make and sell parts.
Shu savoldagi soʻzlar · soʻzlarni saqlash uchun kiring
- 고장 나다
- 고쳐 쓰다
- 부품