सुन्न थिच्नुहोस्
ट्रान्सक्रिप्ट
남자의 중심 생각으로 가장 알맞은 것을 고르십시오.
व्याख्या
Questions 31–32 are debates: the woman raises the issue and objections, the man states his position. Focus on what follows '하지만' and on his last line. He says barring all children '지나치다고 봅니다', proposes '보호자가 지켜야 할 규칙을 분명히 알리는 게 맞지 않을까요?' and concludes '출입 자체를 막기보다 함께 이용하는 방법을 찾아야 합니다'. So the answer is 2. Option 3 is the opposite stance; option 1 is wrong because he doesn't deny the owner's responsibility but suggests consent forms; option 4 is never said.
यो प्रश्नका शब्दहरू · शब्द सेभ गर्न लग इन गर्नुहोस्
- 출입
- 권리
- 보장하다
- 지나치다
- 소란
- 보호자
남자의 태도로 가장 알맞은 것을 고르십시오.
व्याख्या
Attitude questions are about how he speaks, not what. He opens with '충분히 이해합니다' (partial concession), objects with '하지만', and offers concrete solutions: rules for guardians and a '보호자 동의서'. That is 'acknowledging part of the other view while proposing an alternative', answer 4. Option 2 is wrong because he doesn't fully agree; option 3 is wrong because he argues a personal position rather than reporting objectively; option 1 is the opposite of his stance.
यो प्रश्नका शब्दहरू · शब्द सेभ गर्न लग इन गर्नुहोस्
- 입장
- 책임
- 동의서
- 대안
- 인정하다